![](\"https:\/\/truthdig.b-cdn.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/clarenceunbound.png?width=878&height=585\")
Clarence Thomas went more than 10 years<\/a> without asking a single substantive question from the bench. His silence between 2006 and 2016 prompted commentators<\/a> to call his courtroom quietude embarrassing, a sign of fatigue and a lack of intellectual candle power. Even earlier in his career, he had earned the nickname of \u201cScalia\u2019s Puppet<\/a>\u201d for his habit of joining majority opinions written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the outspoken and reactionary \u201coriginalist\u201d who shared the dais with him until his death in 2016.\u00a0<\/p> But the characterization of Thomas as an inattentive echo of Scalia is wrong. Thomas has always been more extreme and dangerous than Scalia, and his influence has never been greater.\u00a0<\/p> After his bruising 1991 confirmation hearing, Thomas set his eyes on the goal of moving American law backwards to the laissez-faire era of the Gilded Age, undoing the regulatory state of the New Deal, weakening the civil rights legislation of the 1950s and 60s and undermining many of the forward-looking precedent decisions issued by the Warren court. As Thomas reportedly told<\/a>\u00a0two of his law clerks in 1993, he planned to serve until 2034, and until then would continue to make the lives of liberals \u201cmiserable.\u201d\u00a0He has already made good on that pledge: He is now the second-longest serving Supreme Court justice in history.<\/a>\u00a0<\/p> Thomas has always been more extreme and dangerous than Scalia, and his influence has never been greater.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure> Thomas is best known for concurrences and dissents that seemed culled from the lunatic fringe when he wrote them, but were later embraced by the majority as the court moved hard right.\u00a0<\/p> On affirmative action, in a 1995 case on government contracting (Adarand Constructors v. Pena<\/a>), his concurrence denounced \u201cremedial racial preferences\u201d in federal hiring as a form of \u201cracial paternalism.\u201d This was an astonishing choice of words for the nation\u2019s second Black Supreme Court justice, who overcame childhood poverty and after a brief flirtation with Black nationalism, became the beneficiary of affirmative action at Yale Law School<\/a>. Twenty-eight years later, however, in a majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts (Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard<\/a>), the court ended affirmative action in higher education.<\/p> On abortion in a 2000 case (Stenberg v. Carhart<\/a>) that invalidated Nebraska\u2019s late-term abortion ban, Thomas dissented, arguing that \u201cRoe v. Wade<\/a>\u201d was \u201cgrievously wrong,\u201d and that nothing in the Constitution \u201cdictates that a State\u201d must legalize abortion. Twenty-two years later, Samuel Alito\u2019s majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/a> adopted Thomas\u2019 view.\u00a0<\/p> Ditto for the Second Amendment. In Printz v. United States<\/a>, a 1997 gun-regulation case, Thomas contributed a concurrence arguing that the Amendment encompassed a personal<\/em>\u00a0right to keep and bear arms rather than simply a right connected with service in state militias, as prior caselaw<\/a> had clearly held. Eleven years later, in District of Columbia v. Heller<\/a>, the court recognized the personal right in an opinion authored by Scalia. Thomas went on to expand the personal right in 2022 with his majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assoc. v. Bruen<\/a>, a decision that severely handicaps state and local authorities from enforcing gun-control laws.\u00a0<\/p> Thomas is also on record advising the court to revisit<\/a> its precedent decisions<\/a> on the right to court-appointed counsel in criminal trials (Gideon v. Wainwright<\/a>,1963); the right of married persons to contraception (Griswold v. Connecticut<\/a>, 1965); the right of adults to engage in private consensual sex (Lawrence v. Texas<\/a>, 2003); and the right to same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges<\/a>, 2015). He has also called for the court to reconsider<\/a> 1964\u2019s\u00a0New York Times v. Sullivan<\/a>, the landmark case establishing First Amendment protections in defamation cases involving public officials and public figures, which is widely considered the lynchpin of freedom of the press in America.\u00a0<\/p> In a recent column<\/a> published by the influential Scotusblog<\/a> website, constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky noted that \u201cThomas is the only justice\u2026who has openly said that precedent deserves little weight in constitutional law.\u201d\u00a0<\/p> Despite his laid-back courtroom demeanor, Thomas has also been an active and loquacious speaker out of court on the right-wing banquet and convention circuit, especially in meetings of the Federalist Society<\/a> and events hosted by Hillsdale College<\/a>, the Michigan-based private Christian institution long recognized as a hub for conservative thought-leaders<\/a> and a breeding ground for the right-wing\u2019s ever expanding culture wars.\u00a0<\/p> Supreme Court justices typically attend academic, judicial and bar-related conferences, and initially, Thomas\u2019 public remarks were fairly judge-like, focusing on time-honored topics like judicial independence<\/a>. But as his stature grew and the court\u2019s lurch to the right accelerated, he shed whatever inhibitions he once had about voicing his personal beliefs, becoming in time a full-fledged and open culture-war combatant.\u00a0<\/p> Thomas is now unbound and unrestrained.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure> In a 2011 address<\/a> at a law-student symposium sponsored by the Federalist Society in Charlottesville, Virginia, he devoted most of his time not to expounding on legal doctrine but to defending his tea-party activist wife Ginni against adverse press coverage. He also exhorted his young audience to be wary of the \u201cfundamental changes\u201d wrought by the left that aimed to distort the original meaning of the Constitution. In a 2016 commencement speech at Hillsdale<\/a>, he went further, urging graduates \u201cnot [to] hide your faith and your beliefs under a bushel basket\u2026in this world that seems to have gone mad with political correctness.\u201d<\/p> Thomas is now unbound and unrestrained. In a\u00a0speech<\/a>\u00a0on April 15 at the University of Texas, he went \u201cfull Monty<\/a>\u201d in an unhinged broadside against liberals and progressives. \u201cProgressivism seeks to replace the basic premises of the Declaration of Independence and hence our form of government declaring,\u201d he declared, continuing:\u00a0<\/p> It holds that our rights and our dignities come not from God but from government\u2026[Progressivism] was the first mainstream American political movement\u2014with the possible exception of the pro-slavery reactionaries on the eve of the Civil War\u2014to openly oppose the principles of the Declaration.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote> He went on to blame progressives for the 20th<\/sup> century evils of racial segregation and eugenics, insisting<\/a> that \u201cStalin, Hitler, Mussolini, and Mao\u201d were \u201cintertwined with the rise of progressivism.\u201d\u00a0<\/p> All this from an angry and embittered ideologue who is also arguably the most corrupt justice in the Supreme Court\u2019s history, having failed for 13 years to report his wife Virginia\u2019s earnings<\/a> on his annual financial disclosure forms, and who has been on the gimme end of lavish vacations funded by billionaire Republican donor Harlan Crow<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p> Thomas celebrated his 78th<\/sup> birthday on June 23. He may not make it to his projected retirement date of 2034, but until he actually steps down, whether voluntarily or post mortem in the fashion of Scalia, there is no telling how much more jurisprudential carnage he will cause or how much more disgrace he will bring to the reputation of the world\u2019s most powerful judicial tribunal.\u00a0<\/p>\n The post Clarence Thomas, Unbound<\/a> appeared first on Truthdig<\/a>.<\/p>\r\n\n
\n
\n
clarence thomas,corruption,Harlan Crow,john roberts,scotus\r\n
Source link www.truthdig.com<\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Clarence Thomas went more than 10 years without asking a single substantive question from the bench. His silence between 2006 and 2016 prompted commentators to call his courtroom quietude embarrassing, a sign of fatigue and a lack of intellectual candle power. Even earlier in his career, he had earned the nickname of \u201cScalia\u2019s Puppet\u201d for his habit of joining majority…","protected":false},"author":606,"featured_media":71,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1238,1036,1239,1013,764],"class_list":["post-2878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-clarence-thomas","tag-corruption","tag-harlan-crow","tag-john-roberts","tag-scotus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/606"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2878\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wokeantifa.org\/topics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}